The Constituency
← Back to bills
H.Res. 672 · Congress
Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 4553) making appropriations for energy and water development and related agencies for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes; providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 104) providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Land Management relating to ‘‘Miles City Field Office Record of Decision and Approved Resource Management Plan Amendment’’; providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 105) providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Land Management relating to ‘‘North Dakota Field Office Record of Decision and Approved Resource Management Plan’’; providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 106) providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Land Management relating to ‘‘Central Yukon Record of Decision and Approved Resource Management Plan’’; and for other purposes.
Introduced Sep 3, 2025 · Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
What does this mean?

This is a procedural measure passed by the House that sets the rules for debating four separate items, rather than being a policy change itself. One item is a spending bill that would fund energy and water projects (like dams, power grids, and nuclear research programs) for the year starting October 2025. The other three items are resolutions that, if passed, would cancel land-use plans the Bureau of Land Management (the federal agency that manages public lands for uses like grazing, drilling, and conservation) put in place for areas in Montana, North Dakota, and Alaska — plans that determine what activities, like oil and gas drilling or wildlife protection, are allowed on those specific public lands. This rule itself doesn't fund anything or cancel any land plan; it just allows the House to move forward with debating and voting on those four separate proposals.

Read the official CRS summary on Congress.gov →
Bill Lifecycle
Real action history from Congress.gov — where this bill is in the process, and every recorded step along the way.
Passed House
Sep 3, 2025
Full action history (9)
Sep 3, 2025Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Sep 3, 2025On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by recorded vote: 212 - 208, 1 Present (Roll no. 222). (text: CR H3771)
Sep 3, 2025Passed/agreed to in House: On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by recorded vote: 212 - 208, 1 Present (Roll no. 222). (text: CR H3771-3772: 1)
Sep 3, 2025On ordering the previous question Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 212 - 209 (Roll no. 221).
Sep 3, 2025DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H. Res. 672.
Sep 3, 2025Considered as privileged matter. (consideration: CR H3771-3779)
Spot an error on this page, or have a suggestion? Send feedback →